Go to Top
435,867,276 searches since Nov. 29, 2004

Flax Subsidies** in the United States totaled $3.1 million in 2011

Congressional Districts in United States Receiving flax subsidies**, 2011
Rank District Flax Subsidies**
2011
Pct of
Total
Running
Percentage
1At Large District of North Dakota (Rep. Rick Berg)$579,06618.7%18.7%
2At Large District of South Dakota (Rep. Kristi L. Noem)$28,3020.9%19.6%
3At Large District of Montana (Rep. Denny Rehberg)$17,0240.5%20.2%
47th District of Minnesota (Rep. Collin C. Peterson)$6,9840.2%20.4%
51st District of Idaho (Rep. Raul R. Labrador)$1,4490.0%20.4%
61st District of Kansas (Rep. Tim Huelskamp)$2020.0%20.4%
73rd District of Nebraska (Rep. Adrian Smith)$1690.0%20.5%
85th District of Washington (Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers)$1510.0%20.5%
94th District of Washington (Rep. Doc Hastings)$1350.0%20.5%
104th District of Michigan (Rep. Dave Camp)$800.0%20.5%
114th District of Missouri (Rep. Vicky Hartzler)$410.0%20.5%
123th District of Iowa (Rep. Tom Latham)$210.0%20.5%
132nd District of Minnesota (Rep. John Kline)$130.0%20.5%
141st District of Minnesota (Rep. Timothy J. Walz)$130.0%20.5%
1510th District of Michigan (Rep. Candice S. Miller)$80.0%20.5%
166th District of South Carolina (Rep. James E. Clyburn)$70.0%20.5%
1718th District of Illinois (Rep. Aaron Schock)$70.0%20.5%
188th District of Minnesota (Rep. Chip Cravaack)$60.0%20.5%
19At Large District of Vermont (Rep. Peter Welch)$50.0%20.5%
205th District of South Carolina (Rep. Mick Mulvaney)$40.0%20.5%
218th District of Indiana (Rep. Larry Bucshon)$30.0%20.5%
2214th District of Illinois (Rep. Randy Hultgren)$30.0%20.5%
237th District of Wisconsin (Rep. Sean P. Duffy)$20.0%20.5%
244th District of Iowa (Rep. Steve King)$10.0%20.5%
252nd District of Oregon (Rep. Greg Walden)$10.0%20.5%

NOTE: Not all recipients were able to be placed into Congressional Districts so the District total may not total 100%. Nationally 96% of all program monies were designated into a Congressional District

Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.

** Crop totals are an estimate. In the data received by EWG for 2009-2011, USDA does not differentiate Direct Payments or Counter-Cyclical Payments by crop as in previous years. EWG allocated the region's Direct Payments by crop for the 2009-2011 calendar year using the proportion of that crop's Direct Payments in 2008. Number of recipients receiving Direct Payments for that crop were not estimated. Due to the way Counter Cyclical Payments are made - EWG was not able to allocate Counter Cyclical Payments to crops. Also included in the crop totals are the crop insurance premiums as reported by the USDA Risk Management Agency for that crop. The crop insurance premium is the amount of money that is calculated by USDA to make the program actuarially sound. Crop insurance premium subsidies are available at the county, state and national level.