| Rank |
County |
Subtotal, Farming Subsidies
2011 | Pct of
Total | Running
Percentage |
| 1 | Bolivar County, Mississippi | $13,571,779 | 11.1% | 11.1% |
| 2 | Washington County, Mississippi | $11,705,824 | 9.6% | 20.7% |
| 3 | Sunflower County, Mississippi | $9,966,709 | 8.2% | 28.9% |
| 4 | Coahoma County, Mississippi | $9,249,836 | 7.6% | 36.4% |
| 5 | Leflore County, Mississippi | $8,299,242 | 6.8% | 43.2% |
| 6 | Yazoo County, Mississippi | $6,942,464 | 5.7% | 48.9% |
| 7 | Tallahatchie County, Mississippi | $6,175,910 | 5.1% | 54.0% |
| 8 | Tunica County, Mississippi | $5,259,944 | 4.3% | 58.3% |
| 9 | Humphreys County, Mississippi | $4,269,676 | 3.5% | 61.8% |
| 10 | Sharkey County, Mississippi | $4,118,532 | 3.4% | 65.2% |
| 11 | Quitman County, Mississippi | $4,105,205 | 3.4% | 68.5% |
| 12 | Holmes County, Mississippi | $3,597,736 | 2.9% | 71.5% |
| 13 | Noxubee County, Mississippi | $2,714,805 | 2.2% | 73.7% |
| 14 | Panola County, Mississippi | $2,629,919 | 2.2% | 75.9% |
| 15 | Jackson County, Mississippi | $2,491,716 | 2.0% | 77.9% |
| 16 | Issaquena County, Mississippi | $2,332,831 | 1.9% | 79.8% |
| 17 | Madison County, Mississippi | $1,791,604 | 1.5% | 81.3% |
| 18 | Harrison County, Mississippi | $1,559,967 | 1.3% | 82.5% |
| 19 | DeSoto County, Mississippi | $1,272,626 | 1.0% | 83.6% |
| 20 | Monroe County, Mississippi | $1,250,345 | 1.0% | 84.6% |
| 21 | Calhoun County, Mississippi | $1,235,937 | 1.0% | 85.6% |
| 22 | Warren County, Mississippi | $1,214,837 | 1.0% | 86.6% |
| 23 | Tate County, Mississippi | $1,031,238 | 0.8% | 87.5% |
| 24 | Chickasaw County, Mississippi | $971,507 | 0.8% | 88.3% |
| 25 | Marshall County, Mississippi | $960,229 | 0.8% | 89.1% |
| 26 | Hinds County, Mississippi | $834,085 | 0.7% | 89.7% |
| 27 | Carroll County, Mississippi | $827,294 | 0.7% | 90.4% |
| 28 | Grenada County, Mississippi | $705,900 | 0.6% | 91.0% |
| 29 | Lee County, Mississippi | $693,366 | 0.6% | 91.6% |
| 30 | Lowndes County, Mississippi | $671,313 | 0.5% | 92.1% |
| 31 | Pontotoc County, Mississippi | $656,478 | 0.5% | 92.6% |
| 32 | Union County, Mississippi | $547,343 | 0.4% | 93.1% |
| 33 | Webster County, Mississippi | $528,335 | 0.4% | 93.5% |
| 34 | Adams County, Mississippi | $516,395 | 0.4% | 93.9% |
| 35 | Montgomery County, Mississippi | $488,369 | 0.4% | 94.3% |
| 36 | Yalobusha County, Mississippi | $476,031 | 0.4% | 94.7% |
| 37 | Prentiss County, Mississippi | $458,033 | 0.4% | 95.1% |
| 38 | Benton County, Mississippi | $436,160 | 0.4% | 95.5% |
| 39 | Attala County, Mississippi | $397,670 | 0.3% | 95.8% |
| 40 | Rankin County, Mississippi | $396,500 | 0.3% | 96.1% |
| 41 | Clay County, Mississippi | $396,289 | 0.3% | 96.4% |
| 42 | Lafayette County, Mississippi | $359,404 | 0.3% | 96.7% |
| 43 | Alcorn County, Mississippi | $354,802 | 0.3% | 97.0% |
| 44 | Jefferson County, Mississippi | $312,035 | 0.3% | 97.3% |
| 45 | Claiborne County, Mississippi | $298,918 | 0.2% | 97.5% |
| 46 | Tippah County, Mississippi | $296,685 | 0.2% | 97.8% |
| 47 | George County, Mississippi | $286,944 | 0.2% | 98.0% |
| 48 | Itawamba County, Mississippi | $251,646 | 0.2% | 98.2% |
| 49 | Hancock County, Mississippi | $237,804 | 0.2% | 98.4% |
| 50 | Scott County, Mississippi | $180,244 | 0.1% | 98.6% |
| 51 | Leake County, Mississippi | $169,899 | 0.1% | 98.7% |
| 52 | Tishomingo County, Mississippi | $142,829 | 0.1% | 98.8% |
| 53 | Forrest County, Mississippi | $139,658 | 0.1% | 98.9% |
| 54 | Winston County, Mississippi | $116,303 | 0.1% | 99.0% |
| 55 | Copiah County, Mississippi | $112,297 | 0.1% | 99.1% |
| 56 | Lawrence County, Mississippi | $109,447 | 0.1% | 99.2% |
| 57 | Covington County, Mississippi | $92,575 | 0.1% | 99.3% |
| 58 | Perry County, Mississippi | $91,793 | 0.1% | 99.4% |
| 59 | Choctaw County, Mississippi | $87,569 | 0.1% | 99.4% |
| 60 | Oktibbeha County, Mississippi | $83,281 | 0.1% | 99.5% |
| 61 | Newton County, Mississippi | $63,626 | 0.1% | 99.5% |
| 62 | Kemper County, Mississippi | $58,360 | 0.0% | 99.6% |
| 63 | Franklin County, Mississippi | $57,120 | 0.0% | 99.6% |
| 64 | Neshoba County, Mississippi | $52,310 | 0.0% | 99.7% |
| 65 | Walthall County, Mississippi | $50,314 | 0.0% | 99.7% |
| 66 | Simpson County, Mississippi | $43,054 | 0.0% | 99.8% |
| 67 | Jefferson Davis County, Mississippi | $34,217 | 0.0% | 99.8% |
| 68 | Pike County, Mississippi | $28,950 | 0.0% | 99.8% |
| 69 | Clarke County, Mississippi | $28,657 | 0.0% | 99.8% |
| 70 | Jones County, Mississippi | $24,808 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 71 | Lincoln County, Mississippi | $24,351 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 72 | Greene County, Mississippi | $23,690 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 73 | Amite County, Mississippi | $22,784 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 74 | Jasper County, Mississippi | $17,554 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 75 | Pearl River County, Mississippi | $16,414 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 76 | Wayne County, Mississippi | $15,841 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 77 | Smith County, Mississippi | $14,671 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 78 | Marion County, Mississippi | $13,059 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 79 | Lauderdale County, Mississippi | $8,654 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 80 | Lamar County, Mississippi | $5,496 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 81 | Stone County, Mississippi | $2,508 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Note: The information on conservation spending for 2011 is incomplete due to missing data from USDA's Natural Resource Conservation Service. In addition some payments made in 2010 were not assigned to recipients in the data received from NRCS. Those payments are also not included.
The information provided for the Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) provides an inaccurate picture of how WRP payments are distributed. USDA's Natural Resource Conservation Service uses title companies as intermediaries to finalize wetlands easements under the Wetlands Reserve Program. As a result, the data provided to us shows large sums of money going to these title companies. In reality, the payments are ultimately distributed to landowners participating in the WRP.
Unfortunately, NRCS has not provided the data to show where these farms and wetlands are located or which farmers or landowners are enrolling in the program, so EWG is unable to allocate these large sums of money to individuals beyond the title companies. Therefore, these companies skew the conservation rankings and payment concentration, which EWG cannot avoid unless and until NRCS makes available the additional farm attribution data. Therefore, we have not included WRP payments in the 2011 data update.
We have separated data on farm commodity, disaster and conservation payments in order to provide a more accurate picture of top recipients and concentration of payments among the three main categories of USDA programs.
Finally, EWG works hard to ensure the accuracy of the information it provides through its products and services, but obtains data for the Farm Subsidy Database from the U.S. Department of Agriculture pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. Therefore, EWG cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information USDA provides or any analysis based thereon. If you find an error or discrepancy on the site, please contact your local USDA Farm Service Agency office to check its records before contacting EWG.
