Total Subsidies payments in Nebraska totaled $729 million in 2009
Total Subsidies by state, 2009
| Rank | State | Total Subsidies 2009 | Pct of Total | Running Percentage |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Texas | $1,472,758,873 | 9.6% | 9.6% |
| 2 | Iowa | $1,159,554,583 | 7.5% | 17.1% |
| 3 | Illinois | $936,268,611 | 6.1% | 23.2% |
| 4 | Kansas | $881,436,247 | 5.7% | 28.9% |
| 5 | Minnesota | $876,977,753 | 5.7% | 34.6% |
| 6 | North Dakota | $859,440,858 | 5.6% | 40.2% |
| 7 | Nebraska | $729,321,776 | 4.7% | 44.9% |
| 8 | California | $610,921,975 | 4.0% | 48.9% |
| 9 | South Dakota | $602,529,945 | 3.9% | 52.8% |
| 10 | Missouri | $518,942,120 | 3.4% | 56.2% |
| 11 | Wisconsin | $513,543,740 | 3.3% | 59.5% |
| 12 | Indiana | $488,471,024 | 3.2% | 62.7% |
| 13 | Arkansas | $481,651,745 | 3.1% | 65.8% |
| 14 | Ohio | $410,836,255 | 2.7% | 68.5% |
| 15 | Georgia | $386,336,526 | 2.5% | 71.0% |
| 16 | Mississippi | $385,848,234 | 2.5% | 73.5% |
| 17 | North Carolina | $353,041,928 | 2.3% | 75.8% |
| 18 | Montana | $349,638,179 | 2.3% | 78.0% |
| 19 | Oklahoma | $308,460,757 | 2.0% | 80.0% |
| 20 | Colorado | $285,379,113 | 1.9% | 81.9% |
| 21 | Louisiana | $284,838,229 | 1.8% | 83.7% |
| 22 | Michigan | $255,001,790 | 1.7% | 85.4% |
| 23 | Kentucky | $245,598,978 | 1.6% | 87.0% |
| 24 | Washington | $241,986,627 | 1.6% | 88.6% |
| 25 | Tennessee | $224,364,186 | 1.5% | 90.0% |
| 26 | Pennsylvania | $177,957,477 | 1.2% | 91.2% |
| 27 | Idaho | $169,028,483 | 1.1% | 92.3% |
| 28 | Alabama | $164,349,212 | 1.1% | 93.3% |
| 29 | New York | $155,633,502 | 1.0% | 94.4% |
| 30 | South Carolina | $127,569,132 | 0.8% | 95.2% |
| 31 | Florida | $124,708,987 | 0.8% | 96.0% |
| 32 | Virginia | $106,508,744 | 0.7% | 96.7% |
| 33 | Arizona | $102,114,522 | 0.7% | 97.3% |
| 34 | Oregon | $96,205,399 | 0.6% | 98.0% |
| 35 | New Mexico | $76,265,607 | 0.5% | 98.5% |
| 36 | Maryland | $55,696,686 | 0.4% | 98.8% |
| 37 | Vermont | $34,066,008 | 0.2% | 99.0% |
| 38 | Utah | $28,867,456 | 0.2% | 99.2% |
| 39 | Wyoming | $27,941,472 | 0.2% | 99.4% |
| 40 | Maine | $15,889,329 | 0.1% | 99.5% |
| 41 | Delaware | $14,217,123 | 0.1% | 99.6% |
| 42 | New Jersey | $11,544,683 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 43 | Connecticut | $8,049,597 | 0.1% | 99.7% |
| 44 | Massachusetts | $7,441,430 | 0.0% | 99.8% |
| 45 | Hawaii | $6,883,769 | 0.0% | 99.8% |
| 46 | Puerto Rico | $6,869,485 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 47 | West Virginia | $6,834,646 | 0.0% | 99.9% |
| 48 | Nevada | $6,366,712 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 49 | New Hampshire | $4,052,178 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 50 | Alaska | $1,305,837 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 51 | Rhode Island | $383,150 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
| 52 | US Virgin Islands | $26,498 | 0.0% | 100.0% |
Source: Environmental Working Group. Compiled from USDA data.
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf