USDA subsidies for farms in 6th District of Tennessee (Rep. Diane Black) totaled $242,885,000 from 1995 through 2012.
| Year | Conservation Subsidies | Disaster Subsidies | Commodity Subsidies | Crop Insurance Premium Subsidies | Total USDA Subsidies |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payments / Recipients |
Payments / Recipients |
Payments / Recipients |
Subsidies / Policies |
Payments / Recipients |
|
| 1995 | $1,701,947 928 |
$424,304 110 |
$1,710,876 1,392 |
$0 0 |
$3,837,127 2,282 |
| 1996 | $1,623,860 887 |
$-8,960 4 |
$3,468,353 4,173 |
$0 0 |
$5,083,252 4,640 |
| 1997 | $1,192,292 567 |
$14,001 12 |
$3,621,579 4,179 |
$0 0 |
$4,827,872 4,460 |
| 1998 | $1,126,462 442 |
$13,363 13 |
$6,455,035 4,291 |
$0 0 |
$7,594,860 4,518 |
| 1999 | $996,625 326 |
$6,390,602 3,782 |
$11,324,719 4,533 |
$0 0 |
$18,711,946 7,239 |
| 2000 | $1,136,856 590 |
$7,955,686 5,273 |
$24,552,005 17,977 |
$0 0 |
$33,644,547 19,183 |
| 2001 | $1,517,362 703 |
$8,806,106 4,377 |
$16,803,921 18,465 |
$0 0 |
$27,127,388 19,376 |
| 2002 | $736,669 246 |
$4,830,493 4,636 |
$6,224,554 5,265 |
$0 0 |
$11,791,716 8,589 |
| 2003 | $1,114,171 336 |
$3,286,583 2,229 |
$8,436,715 14,888 |
$0 0 |
$12,837,469 15,689 |
| 2004 | $1,026,674 344 |
$105,667 31 |
$6,808,900 3,997 |
$0 0 |
$7,941,242 4,196 |
| 2005 | $446,616 212 |
$5,902,428 401 |
$10,223,688 4,409 |
$0 0 |
$16,572,732 4,731 |
| 2006 | $597,754 269 |
$88,672 23 |
$7,290,300 4,197 |
$0 0 |
$7,976,726 4,341 |
| 2007 | $471,809 243 |
$1,088,559 782 |
$3,642,768 3,332 |
$0 0 |
$5,203,136 4,009 |
| 2008 | $675,961 318 |
$10,287,133 3,342 |
$9,395,319 4,534 |
$0 0 |
$20,358,413 6,593 |
| 2009 | $3,941,028 717 |
$2,806,318 1,044 |
$10,896,858 4,230 |
$0 0 |
$17,644,203 5,232 |
| 2010 | $1,162,010 285 |
$2,651,395 348 |
$8,981,181 4,112 |
$0 0 |
$12,794,585 4,404 |
| 2011 | $1,660,996 395 |
$4,311,040 214 |
$8,087,186 4,127 |
$0 0 |
$14,059,221 4,445 |
| 2012 | $598,037 167 |
$5,479,528 209 |
$8,801,199 4,071 |
$0 0 |
$14,878,764 4,248 |
| Total | $21,727,128 3,571 |
$64,432,917 10,466 |
$156,725,154 23,501 |
$0 0 |
$242,885,199 26,947 |
USDA Subsidies to 6th District of Tennessee (Rep. Diane Black) by year
| Year | Subsidy Amount | |
|---|---|---|
| 1995 | $3,837,127 | |
| 1996 | $5,083,252 | |
| 1997 | $4,827,872 | |
| 1998 | $7,594,860 | |
| 1999 | $18,711,946 | |
| 2000 | $33,644,547 | |
| 2001 | $27,127,388 | |
| 2002 | $11,791,716 | |
| 2003 | $12,837,469 | |
| 2004 | $7,941,242 | |
| 2005 | $16,572,732 | |
| 2006 | $7,976,726 | |
| 2007 | $5,203,136 | |
| 2008 | $20,358,413 | |
| 2009 | $17,644,203 | |
| 2010 | $12,794,585 | |
| 2011 | $14,059,221 | |
| 2012 | $14,878,764 | |
| 1995-2012 | $242,885,199 | |
|
||
Note: The information on conservation spending for 2011and 2012 are incomplete due to missing data from USDA's Natural Resource Conservation Service. In addition some payments made in 2010 were not assigned to recipients in the data received from NRCS. Those payments are also not included.
The information provided for the Wetland Reserve Program (WRP) provides an inaccurate picture of how WRP payments are distributed. USDA's Natural Resource Conservation Service uses title companies as intermediaries to finalize wetlands easements under the Wetlands Reserve Program. As a result, the data provided to us shows large sums of money going to these title companies. In reality, the payments are ultimately distributed to landowners participating in the WRP.
Unfortunately, NRCS has not provided the data to show where these farms and wetlands are located or which farmers or landowners are enrolling in the program, so EWG is unable to allocate these large sums of money to individuals beyond the title companies. Therefore, these companies skew the conservation rankings and payment concentration, which EWG cannot avoid unless and until NRCS makes available the additional farm attribution data. Therefore, we have not included WRP payments in the 2011 or 2012 data update.
We have separated data on farm commodity, disaster and conservation payments in order to provide a more accurate picture of top recipients and concentration of payments among the three main categories of USDA programs.
Finally, EWG works hard to ensure the accuracy of the information it provides through its products and services, but obtains data for the Farm Subsidy Database from the U.S. Department of Agriculture pursuant to the Freedom of Information Act. Therefore, EWG cannot guarantee the accuracy of the information USDA provides or any analysis based thereon. If you find an error or discrepancy on the site, please contact your local USDA Farm Service Agency office to check its records before contacting EWG.
