Emergency Conservation Program in the United States, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 4,728
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in the United States totaled $86,378,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | P G C Farms | Brinson, GA 39825 | $880,320 |
2 | Griffin Farms | Rock Port, MO 64482 | $826,468 |
3 | Heard Family Farm | Brinson, GA 39825 | $732,618 |
4 | Estill Ranches LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $500,000 |
5 | Harry & Lynda Properties LLC | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $500,000 |
6 | Wood Family Livestock, Lp | Fresno, CA 93711 | $500,000 |
7 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $453,655 |
8 | James K Stonier Jr | Livermore, CA 94550 | $446,028 |
9 | Randall S Hurst | Altus, AR 72821 | $441,891 |
10 | Smith Ranch-dale And Renee Smith Joint Venture | Okanogan, WA 98840 | $440,322 |
11 | Clemens Charles Schlueter Jr | Triplett, MO 65286 | $438,540 |
12 | Dorrance Ranches Lp | Salinas, CA 93908 | $423,248 |
13 | George Neale Farm LLC | Fort Calhoun, NE 68023 | $402,239 |
14 | Neale Farms Incorporated | Fort Calhoun, NE 68023 | $402,236 |
15 | Estill Ranches Sheep Co LLC | Gerlach, NV 89412 | $392,778 |
16 | Nancy Newlon-nancy Newlon Revocable Trust | Nebraska City, NE 68410 | $383,786 |
17 | Ricky D Hurst | Altus, AR 72821 | $377,187 |
18 | T3 Ranch LLC | Okanogan, WA 98840 | $372,507 |
19 | David W Doonan | Bishop, CA 93514 | $355,893 |
20 | Michael C Foley | Troy, KS 66087 | $342,197 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>