Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program in the United States, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 787
Recipients of Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program from farms in the United States totaled $36,469,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | Contigroup Companies | Boulder, CO 80301 | $183,151 |
| 22 | Dan O Robinson | Calexico, CA 92232 | $171,463 |
| 23 | Waterloo Farm Partnership | Deming, NM 88030 | $165,900 |
| 24 | Dans Feed & Seed | Perris, CA 92570 | $164,684 |
| 25 | H & H Seed Company Inc | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $164,506 |
| 26 | Tony Abatti Farms LLC | El Centro, CA 92243 | $159,306 |
| 27 | Imperial Valley Milling Co | Holtville, CA 92250 | $153,742 |
| 28 | Barkley Company Of Az Ptn | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $136,568 |
| 29 | Jarnagin Farms Ptn 96 | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $135,617 |
| 30 | Gladden Farms II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $134,332 |
| 31 | Phil Rheingans | Moscow, ID 83843 | $127,988 |
| 32 | Triple S Farms Inc | Brawley, CA 92227 | $127,786 |
| 33 | Devon Owen Hay & Straw Company | San Dimas, CA 91773 | $124,614 |
| 34 | Frederick M Young | Brawley, CA 92227 | $118,974 |
| 35 | Pioneer Ranches | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $116,121 |
| 36 | Chrisman B Jackson | El Centro, CA 92244 | $114,823 |
| 37 | C Bar S Land And Cattle | Farwell, TX 79325 | $108,430 |
| 38 | Ivey Brothers Farms | El Paso, TX 79907 | $102,180 |
| 39 | Santa Lucia Farms G P 97 | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $97,103 |
| 40 | Autauga Farming Co Inc | Autaugaville, AL 36003 | $94,395 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf