Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in the United States, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 932,189

Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in the United States totaled $19,331,000,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2
1995-2023
1Farm Services Agency **Langdon, ND 58249$29,088,122
2Agrifund LLC **Amarillo, TX 79106$28,229,006
3Agcountry Farm Credit Services **Jamestown, ND 58402$5,701,864
4Agri Business Finance **St Paris, OH 43072$3,698,036
5Titan SwineIreton, IA 51027$3,266,887
6Southwest Georgia Farm Credit **Bainbridge, GA 39817$3,108,719
7NapiFarmington, NM 87499$2,802,688
8First South Farm Credit Aca **Winnsboro, LA 71295$2,596,350
9Merchants & Planters Bank **Newport, AR 72112$2,453,227
10CfcbBurlington, CO 80807$2,280,069
11H Diamond PartnersSioux Center, IA 51250$2,255,748
12D L Robey FarmsAdairville, KY 42202$2,250,000
13Buttonwillow Land And Cattle CoButtonwillow, CA 93206$2,054,315
14Driscoll BrothersPocatello, ID 83201$1,990,375
15Beacon Credit Union **Wabash, IN 46992$1,971,307
16Frische FarmsDumas, TX 79029$1,819,022
17Commercial Capital Bank **Delhi, LA 71232$1,724,956
18Doug Studer FarmsBritt, IA 50423$1,608,078
19Farm Credit Southeast Missouri **Poplar Bluff, MO 63901$1,594,983
20Weinreis BrothersScottsbluff, NE 69361$1,559,381

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag