Dairy Programs in the United States, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 156,684
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in the United States totaled $6,216,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | T & W Farms | Bakersfield, CA 93311 | $997,742 |
22 | G J Silva Dairy Inc | Turlock, CA 95380 | $995,502 |
23 | Dennis Boertje & Son Dairy | Visalia, CA 93292 | $982,808 |
24 | Gordon Hay Co Inc | Chino, CA 91708 | $977,537 |
25 | Barnes Black & Whiteface Ranch Llp | Addison, VT 05491 | $965,730 |
26 | Foster Farms Dairy | Hickman, CA 95323 | $954,250 |
27 | Carlos Echeverria & Sons | Bakersfield, CA 93313 | $951,336 |
28 | Van Exel Dairy | Lodi, CA 95242 | $935,276 |
29 | Vaqueria Lopez Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $919,714 |
30 | Bosman Dairy LLC | Tipton, CA 93272 | $910,706 |
31 | Lemstra Dairy | Tulare, CA 93274 | $910,008 |
32 | Soares Dairy Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $894,056 |
33 | Alexandre Dairy/alexandre Eco Dairy | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $893,153 |
34 | Milky Way Dairy | Visalia, CA 93291 | $890,767 |
35 | Nop Brothers & Sons | Plainview, TX 79072 | $889,540 |
36 | Fred Rau Dairy Inc | Fresno, CA 93706 | $884,622 |
37 | Jacobus De Groot Dairy 1 & 2 | Visalia, CA 93291 | $881,837 |
38 | Borba Dairy | Porterville, CA 93257 | $851,634 |
39 | Harold K Christensen Jr | Abbotsford, WI 54405 | $833,100 |
40 | Harold Dragt & Sons Dairies LLC | Hanford, CA 93230 | $822,032 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”