Dairy Programs in the United States, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 158,341
Recipients of Dairy Programs from farms in the United States totaled $7,545,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Dairy Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Dennis Boertje & Son Dairy | Visalia, CA 93292 | $1,301,850 |
22 | Dg Partners LLC | Amargosa Valley, NV 89020 | $1,295,611 |
23 | Dostie Farm | Fairfield, ME 04937 | $1,295,436 |
24 | Alexandre Dairy/alexandre Eco Dairy | Crescent City, CA 95531 | $1,293,675 |
25 | David Bakker | Visalia, CA 93291 | $1,244,267 |
26 | Eagle View Farms LLC | Castleford, ID 83321 | $1,236,369 |
27 | Milky Way Dairy | Visalia, CA 93291 | $1,224,896 |
28 | Silva Bros Dairy | Acampo, CA 95220 | $1,222,486 |
29 | Bosman Dairy LLC | Tipton, CA 93272 | $1,210,927 |
30 | Van Ess Dairy LLC | Sanborn, IA 51248 | $1,210,192 |
31 | Las Uvas Valley Dairy | Hatch, NM 87937 | $1,192,601 |
32 | Vaqueria Lopez Inc | Garrochales, PR 00652 | $1,190,978 |
33 | North Point Farm Inc | Waynesboro, VA 22980 | $1,189,432 |
34 | Jacobus De Groot Dairy 1 & 2 | Visalia, CA 93291 | $1,180,961 |
35 | Soares Dairy Farms Inc | Los Banos, CA 93635 | $1,180,223 |
36 | Silverstreak Dairies LLC | Pierz, MN 56364 | $1,171,896 |
37 | Fred Rau Dairy Inc | Fresno, CA 93706 | $1,170,377 |
38 | Harold K Christensen Jr | Abbotsford, WI 54405 | $1,143,433 |
39 | Borba Dairy | Porterville, CA 93257 | $1,130,303 |
40 | Alamo Farms | Keyes, CA 95328 | $1,129,126 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”