Farm Subsidy information
The United States
Total Subsidies in the United States, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 261 to 280 of 4,386,188
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in the United States totaled $477,863,000,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 261 | Sauls Partnership | Shellman, GA 39886 | $10,789,053 |
| 262 | Mascot Planting Company | Clarksdale, MS 38614 | $10,786,505 |
| 263 | Farm Credit Of Western Oklahoma ** | Clinton, OK 73601 | $10,782,062 |
| 264 | Klaveano Brothers Jv | Pomeroy, WA 99347 | $10,778,230 |
| 265 | Marsh Farms | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $10,759,290 |
| 266 | Anderson Planting Co II | Inverness, MS 38753 | $10,741,549 |
| 267 | Flautt Farms | Webb, MS 38966 | $10,724,127 |
| 268 | Henderson Land & Cattle Co | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $10,718,587 |
| 269 | Aguzzi Farms A Partnership | Cleveland, MS 38732 | $10,700,621 |
| 270 | Bearskin Farms | Scott, AR 72142 | $10,693,300 |
| 271 | Arant Acres | Ruleville, MS 38771 | $10,692,537 |
| 272 | Richland Prtsp | Salix, IA 51052 | $10,683,486 |
| 273 | Southern Agricultural Credit Corp ** | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $10,679,137 |
| 274 | Gingg Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $10,640,576 |
| 275 | Bank Of Lake Village | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $10,615,212 |
| 276 | Connelly Farms | Ulmer, SC 29849 | $10,612,214 |
| 277 | First United Bank ** | Park River, ND 58270 | $10,607,790 |
| 278 | Lynndale Partners | Rolling Fork, MS 39159 | $10,571,411 |
| 279 | Delta Production Credit Assn ** | Dermott, AR 71638 | $10,563,961 |
| 280 | E Franklin Larrabee & Assoc | Chico, CA 95926 | $10,551,385 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf