Conservation Reserve Program in the United States, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,134,573

Recipients of Conservation Reserve Program from farms in the United States totaled $47,783,000,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Conservation Reserve Program
1995-2021
21H-4 Farms PartnershipKahlotus, WA 99335$4,506,382
22Horse Creek FarmsSpringfield, CO 81073$4,431,497
23Fort Belknap Indian CommHarlem, MT 59526$4,226,279
24Evans Brothers FarmArbon, ID 83212$4,179,660
25Grimm-davis FarmsChesterfield, MO 63005$4,079,018
26D K Buskirk & Sons PtnrHemingford, NE 69348$4,078,511
27Adams Farm PartnershipCoulee City, WA 99115$4,066,035
28United Bank Of Iowa **Carroll, IA 51401$4,046,773
29Dept Of Natural Resources & Conservation Trust LanHelena, MT 59620$4,015,210
30Walla Walla Farms PartnershipSterling, CO 80751$3,942,415
31Farm Credit Of Southern Colorado **Lamar, CO 81052$3,936,578
32Cobleland Farms JvAmarillo, TX 79105$3,932,560
33The Berg PartnershipPaterson, WA 99345$3,915,802
34Schmitt FarmsProsser, WA 99350$3,895,833
35T-star PartnershipDayton, WA 99328$3,844,747
36D & C Schulte Crp PartnershipGreeley, CO 80631$3,779,729
37Cold Springs Farm PartnershipNewton, UT 84327$3,745,897
38Fort Peck TribesPoplar, MT 59255$3,712,374
39W & L Family Farms GpColfax, WA 99111$3,707,336
40G & L Farms GpBenge, WA 99105$3,624,692

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag