Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program in the United States, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 7,544
Recipients of Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program from farms in the United States totaled $65,342,000 in from 1995-2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Programmatic Environmental Assistance Program 1995-2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Mcdaniel Ranch Partnership | Clewiston, FL 33440 | $405,586 |
| 2 | Plantation Spice Growers Nursery | Goulds, FL 33170 | $320,000 |
| 3 | Sunniland Groves | Immokalee, FL 34142 | $253,910 |
| 4 | Mcarthur Farms | Okeechobee, FL 34972 | $240,000 |
| 5 | Roadrunner Citrus | Tucson, AZ 85737 | $181,978 |
| 6 | Cypress Lake Farms | Sledge, MS 38670 | $163,032 |
| 7 | Edsall Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $160,000 |
| 8 | Johnston Properties Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $160,000 |
| 9 | Bonita Groves Inc | West Palm Beach, FL 33414 | $160,000 |
| 10 | Robert J Lindsey | Vero Beach, FL 32966 | $160,000 |
| 11 | Graves Brothers Company | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $160,000 |
| 12 | Wescott Groves LLC | Fort Pierce, FL 34954 | $160,000 |
| 13 | Bernard A Egan Groves Inc | Fort Pierce, FL 34946 | $160,000 |
| 14 | Kennedy Groves Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32967 | $160,000 |
| 15 | Vero Producers Inc | Vero Beach, FL 32968 | $160,000 |
| 16 | Greene Groves And Ranch Lllp | Vero Beach, FL 32960 | $160,000 |
| 17 | Becker B-14 Grove Ltd | Fort Pierce, FL 34981 | $160,000 |
| 18 | Riverland And Indian Sun Lc | Wauchula, FL 33873 | $160,000 |
| 19 | Delray Linton Associates LLC | Boca Raton, FL 33433 | $160,000 |
| 20 | Thomas S Hammond | Vero Beach, FL 32963 | $160,000 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf