Total Commodity Programs in Alabama, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 16,354
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Alabama totaled $118,007,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James C And Mary J Parker Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $373,807 |
22 | Wiggins Farm | Andalusia, AL 36420 | $373,788 |
23 | 4 M Family Farms | Saint Elmo, AL 36568 | $370,386 |
24 | Friend Bank ** | Slocomb, AL 36375 | $364,010 |
25 | Martin Farm | Courtland, AL 35618 | $363,759 |
26 | Tate Farms General Partnership | Meridianville, AL 35759 | $362,458 |
27 | Newby Farms | Athens, AL 35613 | $360,458 |
28 | Nutrien Ag Solutions | Portageville, MO 63873 | $343,204 |
29 | Bragg Farming Company | Toney, AL 35773 | $335,271 |
30 | Posey Farms | Town Creek, AL 35672 | $328,522 |
31 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $310,486 |
32 | Spruell Farms | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $307,210 |
33 | Big Creek Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $305,691 |
34 | Hayes Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $287,438 |
35 | Sumblin Farm | Kinston, AL 36453 | $287,313 |
36 | Letson Brothers Farms | Hillsboro, AL 35643 | $284,409 |
37 | Isbell Farms | Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 | $281,081 |
38 | Thornton Farms | Rogersville, AL 35652 | $273,571 |
39 | Henderson Farms | Madison, AL 35756 | $273,549 |
40 | George Jeffcoat Farms-03 | Gordon, AL 36343 | $268,688 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”