Counter Cyclical Program in Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 20,150
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Alabama totaled $449,350,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Benton Farms | Benton, AL 36785 | $3,227,532 |
2 | Martin Farm | Courtland, AL 35618 | $2,817,413 |
3 | Devaney Brothers Farms | Madison, AL 35756 | $2,518,232 |
4 | Haney Farms | Athens, AL 35611 | $2,248,456 |
5 | Darden Bridgeforth And Sons | Tanner, AL 35671 | $2,179,794 |
6 | Newby Farms | Athens, AL 35613 | $2,154,058 |
7 | Westover Planting Co | Eufaula, AL 36027 | $2,026,381 |
8 | Hamilton Farms | Hillsboro, AL 35643 | $1,881,263 |
9 | Driskell Cotton Farms | Grand Bay, AL 36541 | $1,832,674 |
10 | Tate Farms | Meridianville, AL 35759 | $1,800,800 |
11 | Blythe Cotton Company | Town Creek, AL 35672 | $1,800,732 |
12 | Lee Farm | Town Creek, AL 35672 | $1,800,362 |
13 | Wendland Farms | Autaugaville, AL 36003 | $1,595,324 |
14 | Isbell Farms | Muscle Shoals, AL 35662 | $1,594,915 |
15 | J B Hain Co | Sardis, AL 36775 | $1,499,369 |
16 | Moravec Farms | Saint Elmo, AL 36568 | $1,462,322 |
17 | Home Place Partners | Prattville, AL 36066 | $1,422,711 |
18 | Wiggins Farm | Andalusia, AL 36420 | $1,400,256 |
19 | Cannon Farms | Theodore, AL 36590 | $1,338,009 |
20 | Vaden Farms | Florence, AL 35633 | $1,244,253 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>