Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Dale County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 106
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Dale County, Alabama totaled $1,875,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | James B Jones | Ariton, AL 36311 | $24,409 |
22 | William L Bullock Estate | Midland City, AL 36350 | $23,481 |
23 | Jack E Jones Jr | Ariton, AL 36311 | $22,330 |
24 | William L Bullock Jr | Midland City, AL 36350 | $22,269 |
25 | Stephanie L Stevens | Midland City, AL 36350 | $21,400 |
26 | Perry T Stevens Jr | Midland City, AL 36350 | $19,160 |
27 | Glenn O Dell | Midland City, AL 36350 | $18,293 |
28 | Lee T Peters | Ozark, AL 36360 | $18,225 |
29 | Jonathan Clay Tharpe | Skipperville, AL 36374 | $17,757 |
30 | Williams Farm LLC | Newton, AL 36352 | $16,069 |
31 | Jeffery L St Cin | Ariton, AL 36311 | $12,265 |
32 | William H Ferguson Jr | Newville, AL 36353 | $11,591 |
33 | Spiller Farms LLC | Ariton, AL 36311 | $11,385 |
34 | Ruby Nell Beasley | Newton, AL 36352 | $11,119 |
35 | Nigel E Wells | Ozark, AL 36360 | $9,515 |
36 | 4c Land & Cattle Co LLC | Ozark, AL 36360 | $9,103 |
37 | Joe L Hodges | Headland, AL 36345 | $8,030 |
38 | Donald Larry Ezell | Ariton, AL 36311 | $7,425 |
39 | Howard Peters | Ozark, AL 36360 | $7,205 |
40 | Colby Ethan Horne | Midland City, AL 36350 | $6,875 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”