Cotton Ginning Program in Dale County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 41
Recipients of Cotton Ginning Program from farms in Dale County, Alabama totaled $935,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Cotton Ginning Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Chris Thompson Farms Gp | Midland City, AL 36350 | $144,210 |
2 | Shipes Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $137,758 |
3 | Thomas Kirkland Farm | Headland, AL 36345 | $63,782 |
4 | Clay Ellenburg Farms | Newton, AL 36352 | $52,130 |
5 | Kirkland Kreek Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $49,066 |
6 | Larry Paul Morrison | Ariton, AL 36311 | $47,221 |
7 | Anna M Fink | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $44,404 |
8 | Mark Donnell Farms | Daleville, AL 36322 | $35,098 |
9 | James L Dell Jr | Dothan, AL 36303 | $33,500 |
10 | David E Byrd | Midland City, AL 36350 | $29,399 |
11 | Nowell Farms | Headland, AL 36345 | $28,594 |
12 | Ned Sconyers | Daleville, AL 36322 | $25,959 |
13 | Thomas A Lavender | Brundidge, AL 36010 | $25,647 |
14 | Byrd Farms LLC | Ariton, AL 36311 | $23,031 |
15 | Byrd Nowell Farms LLC | Headland, AL 36345 | $18,428 |
16 | Lee T Peters | Ozark, AL 36360 | $17,066 |
17 | William L Bullock Estate | Midland City, AL 36350 | $16,624 |
18 | William L Bullock Jr | Midland City, AL 36350 | $16,624 |
19 | Balkcom Farms | Midland City, AL 36350 | $14,156 |
20 | Margaret Lindsey | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $11,460 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>