Farm Subsidy information
Franklin County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Franklin County, Alabama, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 343
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Franklin County, Alabama totaled $1,277,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Gary E Liles | Vina, AL 35593 | $52,875 |
| 2 | Jimmy Bostick | Red Bay, AL 35582 | $52,875 |
| 3 | Harold W Watson & Son Inc | Vina, AL 35593 | $52,875 |
| 4 | Ronnie Wooten Logging, Inc. | Vina, AL 35593 | $52,875 |
| 5 | Swinney Logging LLC | Russellville, AL 35653 | $52,875 |
| 6 | Brian C Bragwell | Russellville, AL 35653 | $52,875 |
| 7 | Brent Robinson Trucking LLC. | Red Bay, AL 35582 | $48,413 |
| 8 | Yielding Farms | Tremont, MS 38876 | $44,797 |
| 9 | William H Coats | Vina, AL 35593 | $30,946 |
| 10 | Cedar Creek Farms Inc | Red Bay, AL 35582 | $29,919 |
| 11 | Thomas Wayne Murray | Russellville, AL 35654 | $19,101 |
| 12 | J Greg Batchelor | Russellville, AL 35653 | $16,476 |
| 13 | James Brandon Warhurst | Russellville, AL 35654 | $15,082 |
| 14 | Chris J Wallace | Russellville, AL 35654 | $15,051 |
| 15 | Spruell Farms | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $14,666 |
| 16 | Marion Import Inc | Haleyville, AL 35565 | $12,556 |
| 17 | Robert Morrow | Russellville, AL 35653 | $11,821 |
| 18 | Daniel Mills | Russellville, AL 35654 | $11,545 |
| 19 | David Daily | Russellville, AL 35654 | $10,738 |
| 20 | Dustin Berryman | Russellville, AL 35654 | $10,669 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf