Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Geneva County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 381
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Geneva County, Alabama totaled $5,166,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Skinner Farms LLC | Hartford, AL 36344 | $51,949 |
22 | Crutchfield Farms Inc | Geneva, AL 36340 | $50,386 |
23 | Ryan Mckenzie | Kinston, AL 36453 | $49,093 |
24 | Chris Strickland | Hartford, AL 36344 | $48,059 |
25 | Ronald Sawyers | Slocomb, AL 36375 | $47,134 |
26 | Lazy S Cattle LLC | Enterprise, AL 36331 | $46,640 |
27 | Harold Gene Merritt Jr | Dothan, AL 36301 | $46,097 |
28 | Four R Farms | Slocomb, AL 36375 | $41,678 |
29 | Stacy Sanders | Newton, AL 36352 | $41,656 |
30 | Mclaney Farms LLC | Hartford, AL 36344 | $40,672 |
31 | Vinson Farms LLC | Hartford, AL 36344 | $40,669 |
32 | Robert Curtis Kelly Jr | Hartford, AL 36344 | $40,009 |
33 | Scott Livestock Company | Hartford, AL 36344 | $39,545 |
34 | Jerry Walter Walden Jr | Daleville, AL 36322 | $39,144 |
35 | Chris Miller | Hartford, AL 36344 | $39,069 |
36 | Gerald Aplin | Slocomb, AL 36375 | $39,068 |
37 | Jered N Mathis | Newton, AL 36352 | $38,711 |
38 | Anna M Fink | Enterprise, AL 36330 | $38,275 |
39 | Patrick J Kelly | Hartford, AL 36344 | $36,932 |
40 | Skinners General Partnership | Hartford, AL 36344 | $35,533 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”