Farm Subsidy information
Macon County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Macon County, Alabama, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 97
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Macon County, Alabama totaled $670,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Stephen P Smith | Darlington, MD 21034 | $2,797 |
22 | Sally B Hatcher | Columbus, GA 31906 | $2,686 |
23 | John T Vaughan Jr | New York, NY 10027 | $2,682 |
24 | Billy Younkin | Cecil, AL 36013 | $2,598 |
25 | Robert H Story | Tuskegee, AL 36083 | $2,478 |
26 | Harry E Noble III | Shorter, AL 36075 | $2,406 |
27 | Marlin Z Ward | Notasulga, AL 36866 | $2,369 |
28 | Leroy Williams | Auburn, AL 36830 | $2,191 |
29 | Thomas J Hill III | Tuskegee, AL 36083 | $2,164 |
30 | Wiley Dougherty | Shorter, AL 36075 | $1,939 |
31 | Alfonza Menefee | Tuskegee, AL 36083 | $1,937 |
32 | Karey M Thompson | Notasulga, AL 36866 | $1,852 |
33 | Joe Calloway Jr | Shorter, AL 36075 | $1,806 |
34 | Donna S Watson | Duluth, GA 30096 | $1,777 |
35 | Michael T Bryant | Grady, AL 36036 | $1,773 |
36 | John F Moorer Jr | Hardaway, AL 36039 | $1,724 |
37 | James F Adams | Notasulga, AL 36866 | $1,634 |
38 | J Madden Hatcher III | Columbus, GA 31904 | $1,628 |
39 | Richard R Hatcher | Marietta, GA 30062 | $1,628 |
40 | Neill B Hatcher | Birmingham, AL 35242 | $1,628 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”