Farm Subsidy information
Madison County, Alabama
Total Subsidies in Madison County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 2,568
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Madison County, Alabama totaled $210,350,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Tate Farms | Meridianville, AL 35759 | $6,251,084 |
2 | Sublett Farms | Ardmore, AL 35739 | $5,212,897 |
3 | Bragg Farming Company | Toney, AL 35773 | $5,043,254 |
4 | Moon Farms | Harvest, AL 35749 | $4,781,020 |
5 | Brown Farms | New Market, AL 35761 | $4,177,673 |
6 | Atkinson Farms | Madison, AL 35756 | $3,297,886 |
7 | Fleming Farms | Laceys Spring, AL 35754 | $3,261,495 |
8 | Bragg Farms | Toney, AL 35773 | $3,168,489 |
9 | Hodge Farms | New Market, AL 35761 | $2,847,750 |
10 | Roger Martin Farms | Madison, AL 35757 | $2,809,177 |
11 | F & W Farms Inc | New Hope, AL 35760 | $2,628,553 |
12 | Vandiver Farms | Madison, AL 35757 | $2,371,303 |
13 | Moore Farms | Toney, AL 35773 | $2,318,911 |
14 | Tate Farms General Partnership | Meridianville, AL 35759 | $2,312,219 |
15 | Devaney Brothers Farms | Madison, AL 35756 | $2,217,545 |
16 | Davis Farms | New Market, AL 35761 | $2,119,552 |
17 | Butler & Son LLC | New Hope, AL 35760 | $2,091,953 |
18 | Patterson Farms | Meridianville, AL 35759 | $1,918,537 |
19 | William G Davis | New Market, AL 35761 | $1,669,577 |
20 | Roger Jeffrey Jones | New Market, AL 35761 | $1,633,732 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>