Total Commodity Programs in Marion County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 936
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Marion County, Alabama totaled $11,348,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Spruell Farms | Mount Hope, AL 35651 | $1,595,862 |
2 | Bottomland Farms LLC | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $727,130 |
3 | B W Rollins Dba B W Rollins Farms | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $533,661 |
4 | B Miller Farms LLC | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $464,300 |
5 | Carl Lucas | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $398,825 |
6 | Rollins Farm LLC | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $350,424 |
7 | B W Rollins Farms | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $314,784 |
8 | Gary D Weatherly | Haleyville, AL 35565 | $314,074 |
9 | Miller Brothers | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $253,343 |
10 | Thompson & Duke Farms LLC | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $247,361 |
11 | Robert D Mccarley | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $231,693 |
12 | Fincher Farms | Hackleburg, AL 35564 | $224,004 |
13 | Howard D Ballard | Detroit, AL 35552 | $219,512 |
14 | George Byron Enlow | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $204,864 |
15 | B Miller Construction LLC Dba Mil | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $196,635 |
16 | Matthew B Campbell | Phil Campbell, AL 35581 | $184,975 |
17 | Martha Rollins | Hamilton, AL 35570 | $138,189 |
18 | Weatherly Holdings, LLC | Haleyville, AL 35565 | $124,890 |
19 | Shelby Blanton | Tremont, MS 38876 | $116,006 |
20 | Benjamin Edward Burleson | Guin, AL 35563 | $109,090 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>