Total Commodity Programs in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 428
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Tuscaloosa County, Alabama totaled $22,121,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Ebsco Industries Inc | Birmingham, AL 35242 | $80,788 |
42 | Ted Salters | Moundville, AL 35474 | $79,744 |
43 | Varner Burt | West Blocton, AL 35184 | $78,640 |
44 | J E Woods | Northport, AL 35475 | $78,145 |
45 | Thomas D Farmer Jr | Tuscaloosa, AL 35406 | $74,090 |
46 | Bea Farms Inc | Ralph, AL 35480 | $70,599 |
47 | Douglas Sanders | Fosters, AL 35463 | $69,178 |
48 | Tony Wheat | Ralph, AL 35480 | $65,763 |
49 | The Westervelt Company | Tuscaloosa, AL 35404 | $61,586 |
50 | Douglas Hughes | Fayette, AL 35555 | $60,126 |
51 | Durell Smelser | Ralph, AL 35480 | $56,156 |
52 | Floyd Hughes Jr | Northport, AL 35475 | $54,834 |
53 | Jimmy Sanford | Tuscaloosa, AL 35403 | $54,720 |
54 | Daniel P Dyer Jr | Berry, AL 35546 | $50,167 |
55 | Ronny Rhodes | Tuscaloosa, AL 35402 | $47,949 |
56 | Smelley Family Trust | Sugar Land, TX 77487 | $44,625 |
57 | Russell Lee | Tuscaloosa, AL 35401 | $44,519 |
58 | Huntleigh Farms | Columbus, MS 39701 | $39,881 |
59 | Randall Keith | Tuscaloosa, AL 35405 | $37,208 |
60 | Richard Leavelle | Buhl, AL 35446 | $35,779 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”