Farm Subsidy information

Alaska

Total Subsidies in Alaska, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 6,071

Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Alaska totaled $154,826,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Total Subsidies
1995-2023
1Dennis Green & Sons PartnershipDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,991,664
2Schultz Farms IncDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,790,454
3Arctic Rose FarmDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,564,102
4John M RobinsonDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,340,927
5Sawmill Creek RanchDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,157,956
6Pamela M RuleDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,154,137
7Eagles' Ridge Community Church IncDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,116,296
8Ronald J RobinsonDelta Junction, AK 99737$1,111,268
9Insanity AcresDelta Junction, AK 99737$911,149
10Marlene J RobinsonDelta Junction, AK 99737$885,006
11Dennis D. And Cleo V. Green RevocDelta Junction, AK 99737$877,042
12Scott W SchultzDelta Junction, AK 99737$848,102
13Michael A SchultzDelta Junction, AK 99737$713,086
14Stevens Village Ira CouncilStevens Village, AK 99774$654,248
15Transalaska PropertiesFairbanks, AK 99707$634,372
16Theuringer FarmDelta Junction, AK 99737$622,296
17Brenda PetersonDelta Junction, AK 99737$547,795
18Kent E SteeleDelta Junction, AK 99737$493,434
19John R TheuringerDelta Junction, AK 99737$460,500
20R & B Wrigley PtnDelta Junction, AK 99737$438,971

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag