Counter Cyclical Program in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,990
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Arizona totaled $370,165,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Discovery West Ranches Partners | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $1,521,664 |
42 | D & D Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $1,513,265 |
43 | Gin Ranch 94 | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,458,250 |
44 | Cockrill Bros Ptshp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $1,451,173 |
45 | Gladden Farms II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,439,029 |
46 | Rolanco Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $1,420,315 |
47 | Bales & Bales II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,413,535 |
48 | Eagle Farms | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $1,405,679 |
49 | Hardison Farms II | Arlington, AZ 85322 | $1,402,578 |
50 | Flying R Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,360,300 |
51 | Carmichael Farms 96 | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $1,356,576 |
52 | Burruel & Burruel Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $1,351,291 |
53 | University Of Arizona | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $1,315,867 |
54 | Vicksburg Growers | Parker, AZ 85344 | $1,309,170 |
55 | John Thude Farms Ptshp 2 | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $1,288,496 |
56 | Auza & Son Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $1,258,398 |
57 | Cullison Farms | Wellton, AZ 85356 | $1,244,483 |
58 | H H & R Farms Ptnshp | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $1,243,058 |
59 | Broken Wing Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $1,219,485 |
60 | Vicksburg Farms An Az Gen Partner | Parker, AZ 85344 | $1,190,102 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”