Loan Deficiency in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 4,072
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Arizona totaled $92,507,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | V & K Wakimoto Farms | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $416,090 |
42 | Frank Shedd & Son Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $409,882 |
43 | O & E Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $409,844 |
44 | Broken Wing Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $399,662 |
45 | B & M Farms Ptshp | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $399,190 |
46 | Jim Pate Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $397,931 |
47 | Elaine Nowlin Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $395,589 |
48 | Bartlett & Bartlett Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $393,985 |
49 | S & N Equipment Co/triple P Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $393,599 |
50 | Robert And Alys Dunn Jv | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $391,848 |
51 | Ak-chin Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $370,155 |
52 | Vip Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $369,111 |
53 | R & D Farms Ptshp | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $367,636 |
54 | Gila Monster Joint Venture | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $356,111 |
55 | Ramona I Button | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $348,785 |
56 | Rick Motes Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $344,640 |
57 | Gary Wiechens | Roll, AZ 85347 | $343,811 |
58 | Accomazzo Company General Partnership | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $343,089 |
59 | River Bush Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $337,792 |
60 | Belloc's Inc | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $334,076 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”