Market Loss Assistance Program in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 3,408
Recipients of Market Loss Assistance Program from farms in Arizona totaled $142,648,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Market Loss Assistance Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Terry Bros Farms | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $523,824 |
42 | Discovery West Ranches Partners | Phoenix, AZ 85037 | $521,149 |
43 | Mohave Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85008 | $520,339 |
44 | Catron Cotton Co | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $514,890 |
45 | Lkh Farming An Arizona Gp | Ehrenberg, AZ 85334 | $501,091 |
46 | Sds Farms Ptns | Marana, AZ 85653 | $492,176 |
47 | Rolanco Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $487,348 |
48 | Dobson Family Farms III C/o Marsh | Chandler, AZ 85248 | $479,340 |
49 | Carmichael Farms 96 | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $474,768 |
50 | Keeling Family Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $472,696 |
51 | G Farms | El Mirage, AZ 85335 | $472,232 |
52 | State Of Arizona | Phoenix, AZ 85009 | $466,207 |
53 | Vicksburg Farms An Az Gen Partner | Parker, AZ 85344 | $455,625 |
54 | Hardison Farms II | Arlington, AZ 85322 | $435,855 |
55 | Fort Mojave Tribe | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $430,906 |
56 | Sierra Negra Farms | Wickenburg, AZ 85358 | $416,597 |
57 | Hct Farms II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $416,175 |
58 | Cockrill Bros Ptshp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $409,524 |
59 | Youngker & Youngker II 93 | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $402,625 |
60 | Jim Pate Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $401,773 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”