Loan Deficiency in Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 4,072
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Arizona totaled $92,507,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | Chris Warren Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $325,338 |
62 | Joe Auza Sheep Co | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $322,932 |
63 | Las Pilas Ranches A Ptns | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $322,244 |
64 | Vernon And Joyce Schulz Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $319,237 |
65 | Lonesome Valley Farms Ltd Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $309,827 |
66 | James Douglas Dunlap | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $307,377 |
67 | Whitewater Farm | Elfrida, AZ 85610 | $307,366 |
68 | Diwan Ranches Ltd | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $306,980 |
69 | Christina Dawn Dunlap | Willcox, AZ 85643 | $304,326 |
70 | Bohlender Arizona Farm Joint Vent | San Simon, AZ 85632 | $302,526 |
71 | Ladra Farms II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $300,835 |
72 | Youngker & Youngker II 93 | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $299,082 |
73 | Buford Douglas Gladden | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $295,082 |
74 | Dickson Farming Co | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $294,870 |
75 | Bsn Farms Ptn | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $293,603 |
76 | Salcot Planting Co | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $289,486 |
77 | Harvey Farms Lmtd Ptnshp | Yuma, AZ 85366 | $287,621 |
78 | Dorame Brothers Custom Hay | Blythe, CA 92226 | $282,314 |
79 | Alex & Norman Pretzer | Tucson, AZ 85715 | $279,343 |
80 | Jonathan W Householder Itty Bitty | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $279,223 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”