Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs in Arizona, 1995-2021

Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 5,067

Recipients of Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs from farms in Arizona totaled $24,438,000 in from 1995-2021.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Livestock Disaster and Emergency Programs
1995-2021
1White Mountain Apache TribeWhiteriver, AZ 85941$504,367
2Point Of Pines Livestock AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$226,112
3Idt Cattle AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$223,475
4Ash Creek Grazing AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$219,550
5R-100 RanchSan Carlos, AZ 85550$206,638
6Tonto Livestock AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$172,793
7Slaughter Mountain Livestock AssociationSan Carlos, AZ 85550$170,538
8Joe Auza Sheep CoCasa Grande, AZ 85130$169,953
9Anchor Seven Livestock AssociatioSan Carlos, AZ 85550$165,485
10Edward BarnesSan Simon, AZ 85632$161,983
11Parsons Co IncMarana, AZ 85653$160,946
12Willow Springs Cattle Co IncDaniel, WY 83115$156,219
13Goff & Goff Ltd PtshpOracle, AZ 85623$148,460
14Falcon Valley Ranch IncTucson, AZ 85739$143,906
15Yavapai Ranch LpScottsdale, AZ 85253$143,201
16J Albert Brown RanchesSaint Johns, AZ 85936$140,843
17Krentz RanchDouglas, AZ 85608$140,107
18Rancho SacatalWillcox, AZ 85644$140,097
19Dobson Cattle Co LlpWillcox, AZ 85643$138,890
20Jeffrey MengesSafford, AZ 85548$138,174

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag