Total Commodity Programs in Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,734
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Arizona totaled $51,120,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 21 | T-k Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $326,957 |
| 22 | Sunset Farms General Partnership | Gila Bend, AZ 85337 | $314,894 |
| 23 | Lone Butte Partnership | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $312,573 |
| 24 | Lkh Farming An Arizona Gp | Ehrenberg, AZ 85334 | $311,857 |
| 25 | Doug Mellon Farms II Inc | Yuma, AZ 85364 | $308,115 |
| 26 | P R P Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $306,374 |
| 27 | Donley Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $302,676 |
| 28 | Vip Farms | Thatcher, AZ 85552 | $302,571 |
| 29 | Nutrien Ag Solutions | Spanish Fort, AL 36527 | $300,000 |
| 30 | Schulz Farms, LLC | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $293,103 |
| 31 | Hardison Farms II | Arlington, AZ 85322 | $286,863 |
| 32 | Ross Farms | Sedona, AZ 86336 | $283,755 |
| 33 | Dan W Boschma Dba Tonopah Dairy | Tonopah, AZ 85354 | $254,346 |
| 34 | Broken Wing Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $250,891 |
| 35 | Las Lunas Pecans LLC | Mcneal, AZ 85617 | $250,000 |
| 36 | Burruel & Burruel Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $243,698 |
| 37 | Associated Farming 92 | Mesa, AZ 85213 | $242,264 |
| 38 | Grand View Dairy LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85016 | $241,248 |
| 39 | Sun Garden Date Growers Lp | Yuma, AZ 85365 | $235,706 |
| 40 | Accomazzo Company General Partnership | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $234,722 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf