Farm Subsidy information
Coconino County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Coconino County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 2,505
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Coconino County, Arizona totaled $94,846,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Nancy Shiew | Paulden, AZ 86334 | $311,478 |
22 | Dennis L Arp | Flagstaff, AZ 86005 | $310,446 |
23 | Shiew Cattle, LLC | Paulden, AZ 86334 | $284,454 |
24 | Windmill Mountain Ranch LLC | Sedona, AZ 86336 | $242,131 |
25 | , | $229,684 | |
26 | Little Horse Ranch Lllp | Phoenix, AZ 85004 | $191,508 |
27 | Auza & Son Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $172,370 |
28 | Good Earth Power Az, LLC | Mesa, AZ 85215 | $152,494 |
29 | Jm Ranch LLC | Prescott, AZ 86305 | $147,758 |
30 | Glen D Reed | Williams, AZ 86046 | $136,775 |
31 | Howard Mesa Land And Cattle Co Ll | Prescott, AZ 86305 | $132,217 |
32 | Bert & Garna Randall Family Trust | Ash Fork, AZ 86320 | $131,653 |
33 | Allen G Grantham | Williams, AZ 86046 | $127,734 |
34 | Goldtrap Ranch | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $119,813 |
35 | Howard Mesa Land And Cattle Co LLC | Williams, AZ 86046 | $115,165 |
36 | Mackelprang Family Trust | Fredonia, AZ 86022 | $111,377 |
37 | Clifford D Finch | Camp Verde, AZ 86322 | $107,555 |
38 | Aja Sheep Co | Litchfield, AZ 85340 | $105,376 |
39 | Blanche B Taho | Tuba City, AZ 86045 | $95,888 |
40 | Goemmer Ranches | Battle Mountain, NV 89820 | $93,268 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”