Farm Subsidy information
Coconino County, Arizona
Total Subsidies in Coconino County, Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 659
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Coconino County, Arizona totaled $11,046,000 in in 2021.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 2021 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Babbitt Ranches LLC | Flagstaff, AZ 86002 | $236,817 |
| 2 | Cataract Natural Reserve Lands LLC | Flagstaff, AZ 86002 | $206,231 |
| 3 | Bar T Bar Ranch Inc | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $187,878 |
| 4 | Flying M Ranch Lllp | Flagstaff, AZ 86002 | $128,166 |
| 5 | Hopi Three Canyon Ranch LLC | Winslow, AZ 86047 | $121,825 |
| 6 | Manterola Sheep Co Inc | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $117,875 |
| 7 | Joseph A Auza Sheep Co LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $117,875 |
| 8 | Joe Auza Sheep Co | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $109,085 |
| 9 | County Line Farms LLC | Lamar, CO 81052 | $73,347 |
| 10 | Fletcher Land And Cattle LLC | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $63,068 |
| 11 | Cholla Livestock LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85028 | $58,937 |
| 12 | Curt A Wells | Chino Valley, AZ 86323 | $57,657 |
| 13 | Auza Ranches LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $57,014 |
| 14 | A3r Trucking LLC | Mesa, AZ 85204 | $52,875 |
| 15 | Keith E Hollis | Glendale, AZ 85305 | $52,875 |
| 16 | Nagiller & Sons Inc | Williams, AZ 86046 | $48,027 |
| 17 | Jilmat Inc | Williams, AZ 86046 | $45,448 |
| 18 | Howard Mesa Land And Cattle Co LLC | Williams, AZ 86046 | $42,935 |
| 19 | Jimmie L Shiew | Flagstaff, AZ 86003 | $34,425 |
| 20 | 55 Ranch LLC | Buckeye, AZ 85396 | $34,369 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Federal crop insurance reform vital for incentivizing climate adaptation on farms
Farm Subsidies Ballooned Under Trump
Is Federal Crop Insurance Policy Leading to Another Dust Bowl?
Double Dipping:
The "Farm Crisis" Myth
Crying Wolf