Production Flexibility Program in La Paz County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 106
Recipients of Production Flexibility Program from farms in La Paz County, Arizona totaled $17,216,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Production Flexibility Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Farmco Partners, An Arizona Partn | Aguila, AZ 85320 | $220,716 |
22 | River Bottom Farms Inc | Cibola, AZ 85328 | $218,532 |
23 | James Keele | Kingman, AZ 86401 | $191,924 |
24 | Sundance Ranch | Parker, AZ 85344 | $188,387 |
25 | Roy Leivas | Parker, AZ 85344 | $183,686 |
26 | H & C Farms | Parker, AZ 85344 | $182,700 |
27 | Rcr Farms Dba Clayton & Son | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $165,602 |
28 | Moon Mountain Farms Inc | Phoenix, AZ 85083 | $160,000 |
29 | Ronald Swan | Cibola, AZ 85328 | $159,513 |
30 | Budren Farms | Upland, CA 91786 | $156,214 |
31 | Sheila Leivas | Parker, AZ 85344 | $151,223 |
32 | R J B L L C | Aguila, AZ 85320 | $120,353 |
33 | Rayburn Evans | Parker, AZ 85344 | $117,813 |
34 | Bernal Brothers II L L C | Parker, AZ 85344 | $117,573 |
35 | Gregory E Sprawls | Blythe, CA 92225 | $115,865 |
36 | Herculano Casares | Parker, AZ 85344 | $107,280 |
37 | Jerry Mc Guire Dba Mcguire Hay Co | Parker, AZ 85344 | $102,230 |
38 | Colorado River Farms Inc | Ehrenberg, AZ 85334 | $99,125 |
39 | Miguel A Torres | Parker, AZ 85344 | $95,518 |
40 | Stephen H Elmore | Brawley, CA 92227 | $95,474 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”