Total Conservation Programs in Maricopa County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 61 to 80 of 95
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Maricopa County, Arizona totaled $3,901,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
61 | A & H Dairy | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $10,971 |
62 | Gene Jagow | Arlington, AZ 85322 | $10,855 |
63 | Tumbleweed Dairy Ptnshp | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $10,795 |
64 | Marilyn Stanberry | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $10,358 |
65 | Lanford Farms Partnership | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $10,263 |
66 | Tim Vanderhart Farms | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $9,635 |
67 | David Schuff | Surprise, AZ 85379 | $9,616 |
68 | Charles A Miccia | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $9,504 |
69 | Richard Michael Kirkpatrick | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $9,433 |
70 | Buckeye Ranch | Phoenix, AZ 85014 | $7,407 |
71 | Allan Shirley | Mesa, AZ 85204 | $7,345 |
72 | William M Saylor | Phoenix, AZ 85044 | $7,000 |
73 | Pace Farms | Chandler, AZ 85244 | $7,000 |
74 | B B F Farming 93 | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $7,000 |
75 | Marven Investments Ltd Ptn | Phoenix, AZ 85018 | $7,000 |
76 | Stephen Williams Farms | Phoenix, AZ 85041 | $6,760 |
77 | Haggard Land & Cattle 96 | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $6,725 |
78 | Ag Enterprises II | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $6,351 |
79 | Arthur Thomas West | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $5,781 |
80 | Paul D Reese | Queen Creek, AZ 85242 | $5,381 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”