Total Conservation Programs in Maricopa County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 95
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Maricopa County, Arizona totaled $3,901,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Salt River Pima Maricopa Indian C | Scottsdale, AZ 85250 | $1,426,235 |
2 | Two Sticks Farms | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $205,860 |
3 | Saddle Mtn Ranch | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $141,375 |
4 | Queen Creek Potato Co Inc | Queen Creek, AZ 85242 | $122,808 |
5 | J & K Investments LLC | Aguila, AZ 85320 | $94,645 |
6 | Sunfresh Farms | Goodyear, AZ 85338 | $84,000 |
7 | Zinke Investments | Sun Lakes, AZ 85248 | $80,368 |
8 | Gin Ranch 94 | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $79,169 |
9 | Everkrisp Vegetables Inc | Tolleson, AZ 85353 | $74,611 |
10 | Miedema Produce Inc | Waddell, AZ 85355 | $67,315 |
11 | Sycamore Farms LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85003 | $65,237 |
12 | Yellow Snail Farms | Scottsdale, AZ 85260 | $61,875 |
13 | Stotz Farm Venture 98 | Avondale, AZ 85323 | $58,752 |
14 | Hardison Farms II | Arlington, AZ 85322 | $49,788 |
15 | Youngker & Youngker II 93 | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $47,377 |
16 | Richard M Sanders | Palo Verde, AZ 85343 | $46,904 |
17 | Gladden Farms II | Buckeye, AZ 85326 | $44,259 |
18 | Stotz Farms Inc Dba Stotz Dairy | Avondale, AZ 85392 | $42,678 |
19 | Carver Mountain Enterprises | Laveen, AZ 85339 | $35,544 |
20 | Hector Stechnij | Mesa, AZ 85212 | $35,290 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>