Total Conservation Programs in Mohave County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 60
Recipients of Total Conservation Programs from farms in Mohave County, Arizona totaled $1,425,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Conservation Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Cedar Creek Land & Cattle Inc | Kingman, AZ 86402 | $14,816 |
22 | Ethan A Bundy | Saint George, UT 84790 | $14,402 |
23 | Gilbert Reeve | Panguitch, UT 84759 | $13,859 |
24 | Eddie M Bundy | Saint George, UT 84790 | $13,845 |
25 | Wagon Bow Ranch | Prescott, AZ 86302 | $12,612 |
26 | Dolores Savala | Fredonia, AZ 86022 | $12,477 |
27 | Linda S Jake | Fredonia, AZ 86022 | $12,156 |
28 | William M Gubler | Santa Clara, UT 84765 | $10,847 |
29 | Darrell Weber | Orem, UT 84097 | $9,619 |
30 | Blake Ltd | St George, UT 84770 | $8,536 |
31 | Larry T Blake | Saint George, UT 84770 | $8,535 |
32 | Howard Foremaster | Washington, UT 84780 | $7,760 |
33 | Daniel Atwood Bundy | Washington, UT 84780 | $7,517 |
34 | Kline Esplin | Mount Carmel, UT 84755 | $7,101 |
35 | Heaton Livestock Company | Alton, UT 84710 | $6,899 |
36 | Trout Creek Ranch Revocable Trust | Wikieup, AZ 85360 | $6,299 |
37 | Bridlebit Three Cattle Co | Saint George, UT 84770 | $5,388 |
38 | Reeve Ranch LLC | Hurricane, UT 84737 | $3,805 |
39 | Bar S Ranch Inc | Kingman, AZ 86401 | $3,500 |
40 | Rolands Investments Inc | Kingman, AZ 86401 | $3,500 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”