Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 in Mohave County, Arizona, 2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 34
Recipients of Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 from farms in Mohave County, Arizona totaled $62,433 in in 2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Coronavirus Food Assistance Program - Round 2 2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fort Mojave Indian Tribe Fmit Avi Kwa Ame Farms | Mohave Valley, AZ 86446 | $52,138 |
2 | Leist Land And Livestock LLC. | Ash Fork, AZ 86320 | $2,904 |
3 | Phil Bravo Jr | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $842 |
4 | Francis Munoz | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $660 |
5 | Everett Manakaja Jr | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $371 |
6 | Webster Mahone | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $371 |
7 | William Dante Bravo | Kingman, AZ 86409 | $334 |
8 | Roselyn Wescogame | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $305 |
9 | Joe Kelly | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $289 |
10 | April Rush | Kingman, AZ 86409 | $281 |
11 | Cheryl Beecher | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $269 |
12 | Charles E Vaughn Sr | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $248 |
13 | Gilbert Crook | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $230 |
14 | Loren Bravo Sr | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $215 |
15 | Loulon M Kisner | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $190 |
16 | , | $182 | |
17 | Delphina Cook | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $182 |
18 | Judd D Majenty | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $178 |
19 | Martin Jackson | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $176 |
20 | Loretta Jackson - Kelly | Peach Springs, AZ 86434 | $173 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>