Counter Cyclical Program in Pima County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 48
Recipients of Counter Cyclical Program from farms in Pima County, Arizona totaled $8,948,000 in from 1995-2023.
| Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Counter Cyclical Program 1995-2023 |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | Burruel & Burruel Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $1,351,291 |
| 2 | Pacheco Farm Management & Consulting Co | Marana, AZ 85653 | $1,083,253 |
| 3 | Post Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $801,052 |
| 4 | Ernest Bratton Etal Ptr Dba La Fa | Marana, AZ 85653 | $712,392 |
| 5 | Clark Farms Jv | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $568,929 |
| 6 | Double B Farms A Ptns | Marana, AZ 85653 | $457,760 |
| 7 | Tnt Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $456,724 |
| 8 | Kai Farms | Cortaro, AZ 85652 | $440,134 |
| 9 | John Kai Jr Farms | Cortaro, AZ 85652 | $316,929 |
| 10 | Murphy Farms J V | Tucson, AZ 85743 | $287,216 |
| 11 | Sds Farms Ptns | Marana, AZ 85653 | $276,434 |
| 12 | Double D Farms Ptshp | Marana, AZ 85653 | $275,758 |
| 13 | J P Cattle Company | Marana, AZ 85653 | $269,214 |
| 14 | Evco Farms Inc | Marana, AZ 85653 | $178,291 |
| 15 | San Xavier Coop Assoc Inc | Tucson, AZ 85746 | $148,285 |
| 16 | Las Pilas Ranches A Ptns | Phoenix, AZ 85021 | $130,000 |
| 17 | 5kg Investment Company LLC | Tucson, AZ 85704 | $121,266 |
| 18 | Buckelew & Buckelew Farms | Tucson, AZ 85735 | $119,698 |
| 19 | Fred Barnett Farms | Marana, AZ 85653 | $116,278 |
| 20 | Sonia Bratton | Marana, AZ 85653 | $105,322 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>
Increasing crop reference prices would hurt young farmers
Do billionaires get farm subsidies?
Crop insurance pays billions in weather-related losses linked to the climate crisis
Crop insurance costs soar over time, reaching a record high in 2022
As the climate emergency heats up the Southwest, crop insurance payouts for heat surge
In the intensifying climate crisis, a hotter Southwest spurs rising heat-related crop insurance costs
