Total Commodity Programs in Pinal County, Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 310
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $16,860,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Fox Butte Growers | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $589,214 |
2 | Ak-chin Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $573,977 |
3 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $502,009 |
4 | Gila River Farms | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $484,815 |
5 | Caballero Dairy Farms LLC | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $451,940 |
6 | Tempe Farming Co | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $432,165 |
7 | Tohono O'odham Farming Authority | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $414,137 |
8 | Du-brook Dairy Inc | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $361,523 |
9 | Windmill Dairy LLC Dba El Dorado Dairy | Casa Grande, AZ 85128 | $361,523 |
10 | Arizona Organic Beans Lllp | Tucson, AZ 85737 | $353,673 |
11 | T-k Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $326,957 |
12 | Donley Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $302,676 |
13 | Terra Firma | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $221,558 |
14 | D & I Holsteins LLC | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $195,293 |
15 | Rio Farming General Partnership | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $193,377 |
16 | Joseph A Auza Sheep Co LLC | Casa Grande, AZ 85122 | $189,208 |
17 | Keeling Family Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $184,947 |
18 | A & B Farms Partnership | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $184,852 |
19 | Fast Track Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $179,655 |
20 | Rio Blanco LLC | Chandler, AZ 85226 | $179,642 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>