Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 74
Recipients of Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $5,909,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Karnal Bunt Fungus Eradication Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Sol Lagos Farms II | Chandler, AZ 85249 | $11,656 |
22 | Pratt Farms Ptshp | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $11,115 |
23 | Cheyenne Farming Company | Stanfield, AZ 85272 | $8,336 |
24 | Knorr Farms A P D LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85239 | $7,734 |
25 | Patrick Clay White | Red Rock, AZ 85245 | $7,587 |
26 | Ronella White | Red Rock, AZ 85145 | $7,587 |
27 | World Wide Wheat LLC | Phoenix, AZ 85034 | $7,483 |
28 | Karl Button | Casa Grande, AZ 85222 | $6,455 |
29 | Mike And Judy Lynch | Coolidge, AZ 85228 | $6,244 |
30 | Judy E Smith | Winkelman, AZ 85292 | $5,452 |
31 | Paul B Smith | Winkelman, AZ 85292 | $5,452 |
32 | Farrell & Farrell | Maricopa, AZ 85239 | $5,209 |
33 | Sossaman Farms Lp | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $5,204 |
34 | Frank Marquez | Eloy, AZ 85231 | $5,202 |
35 | Saddlehorn Ranches LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $5,012 |
36 | Dane Farms | Willcox, AZ 85644 | $4,833 |
37 | C B C Farms Inc | Sacaton, AZ 85247 | $4,373 |
38 | Marathon Farming Co Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $4,124 |
39 | Sbcp Family Ltd Ptshp | Tucson, AZ 85750 | $4,011 |
40 | Rancho Pobre Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $3,832 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”