Total Commodity Programs in Pinal County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 1,524
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $577,798,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Riata Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $3,402,484 |
22 | S & S Harvesting | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $3,230,969 |
23 | Catalina Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $3,219,580 |
24 | Fox Butte Growers | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $3,190,763 |
25 | Frank Shedd & Son Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $3,092,250 |
26 | Dixon Farms Ptshp Dba Lbj Farms | Wilson, NC 27893 | $3,043,304 |
27 | University Of Arizona | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $2,943,480 |
28 | Sierra Farming Partnership II | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $2,831,517 |
29 | River Bush Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $2,827,119 |
30 | England Farming Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $2,822,108 |
31 | Isom & Isom | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $2,775,886 |
32 | Neil Golson Ronald G Morrow Etal Ptr M & G Truckin | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $2,770,653 |
33 | T & G Farms | Arizona City, AZ 85223 | $2,729,656 |
34 | R & D Farms Ptshp | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $2,708,738 |
35 | Morning Star Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $2,687,992 |
36 | Don Pew Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $2,679,730 |
37 | Ruby Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $2,636,027 |
38 | Sierra Farming Partnership III | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $2,602,576 |
39 | Ak Chin Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85239 | $2,585,399 |
40 | Selma Farms Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85230 | $2,573,036 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”