Total Commodity Programs in Pinal County, Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 310
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $16,860,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Thomas Michael Dugan Jr | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $120,508 |
42 | Timothy Scott Dugan | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $120,508 |
43 | Jerry D Ethington | Queen Creek, AZ 85140 | $120,508 |
44 | River Bush Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $115,544 |
45 | Nixon Cotton | Mesa, AZ 85206 | $114,986 |
46 | Cooley Farms LLC | Mesa, AZ 85212 | $112,910 |
47 | Riata Farms | Queen Creek, AZ 85142 | $104,608 |
48 | Raintree Farms II | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $101,597 |
49 | Gable & Hardison Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $100,469 |
50 | Agri-bella Farms LLC | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $100,140 |
51 | Riggins Farms II | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $100,114 |
52 | Brynn-con Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $99,900 |
53 | Itty Bitty Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $98,613 |
54 | Dust Boll Farms | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $98,149 |
55 | Santa Cruz Ranch | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $97,312 |
56 | Jbh Farming | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $96,982 |
57 | Cooley Cattle Company LLC | Gilbert, AZ 85234 | $96,768 |
58 | Green Acres Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $89,184 |
59 | Mark D Smith Enterprises Inc | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $88,221 |
60 | Silver Bullet Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $87,358 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”