Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) in Pinal County, Arizona, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 178
Recipients of Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) from farms in Pinal County, Arizona totaled $8,844,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Price Loss Coverage Program (PLC) 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $501,869 |
2 | Fox Butte Growers | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $501,684 |
3 | Gila River Farms | Sacaton, AZ 85147 | $332,022 |
4 | Tempe Farming Co | Maricopa, AZ 85139 | $326,523 |
5 | Tohono O'odham Farming Authority | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $295,694 |
6 | Ak-chin Farms | Maricopa, AZ 85138 | $287,531 |
7 | T-k Farms | Stanfield, AZ 85172 | $236,656 |
8 | Donley Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $204,627 |
9 | A & B Farms Partnership | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $184,852 |
10 | Terra Firma | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $181,108 |
11 | Keeling Family Ptshp | Casa Grande, AZ 85193 | $157,640 |
12 | Rio Farming General Partnership | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $140,560 |
13 | Hiscox Farms Gp | Coolidge, AZ 85128 | $136,280 |
14 | Fast Track Farms | Casa Grande, AZ 85194 | $129,108 |
15 | Wofford Farms LLC | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $127,184 |
16 | Catalina Farms | Eloy, AZ 85131 | $117,862 |
17 | Sierra Farming Partnership III | Casa Grande, AZ 85130 | $110,150 |
18 | John & Lorna Nevitt Farms | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $96,702 |
19 | Precision Farming | San Tan Valley, AZ 85143 | $95,982 |
20 | Arizona Organic Beans Lllp | Tucson, AZ 85737 | $95,320 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>