Livestock Forage Disaster Program in Santa Cruz County, Arizona, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 45
Recipients of Livestock Forage Disaster Program from farms in Santa Cruz County, Arizona totaled $1,968,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Livestock Forage Disaster Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Hacienda Amado Lllp | Tucson, AZ 85728 | $231,810 |
2 | Oro Blanco Ranch LLC | Nogales, AZ 85621 | $208,446 |
3 | Metz Trust | Tucson, AZ 85715 | $146,591 |
4 | Empire Ranch Properties LLC | Elgin, AZ 85611 | $145,773 |
5 | Zz Cattle Corporation | Nogales, AZ 85628 | $130,151 |
6 | Treasure Chest Books LLC | Tucson, AZ 85703 | $123,411 |
7 | Mark & Laurie Butler Revocable Trust Dba San Anton | Patagonia, AZ 85624 | $75,931 |
8 | Mark T Byrum | Patagonia, AZ 85624 | $70,658 |
9 | , | $68,484 | |
10 | Salero Dos LLC | Scottsdale, AZ 85250 | $59,955 |
11 | , | $47,633 | |
12 | Pyeatt Ranch LLC | Elgin, AZ 85611 | $45,424 |
13 | Rose Tree Cattle Co Lllp | Scottsdale, AZ 85254 | $41,390 |
14 | Babocomari Ranch Co | Sonoita, AZ 85637 | $40,847 |
15 | Farm Services Agency ** | Langdon, ND 58249 | $39,934 |
16 | Pyeatt Living Trust Dated 12/13/0 | Elgin, AZ 85611 | $38,745 |
17 | Ian Wingfield | Nogales, AZ 85628 | $38,731 |
18 | Rose Tree Cattle Co Lllp | Elgin, AZ 85611 | $37,089 |
19 | Agua Caliente Ranch LLC | Scottsdale, AZ 85255 | $36,843 |
20 | William Schock | Elgin, AZ 85611 | $32,450 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>