Environmental Quality Incentives Program in Yavapai County, Arizona, 1995-2023

Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 81

Recipients of Environmental Quality Incentives Program from farms in Yavapai County, Arizona totaled $1,338,000 in from 1995-2023.

Rank Recipient
(* ownership information available)
Location Environmental Quality Incentives Program
1995-2023
21Yavapai Prescott Indian TribePrescott, AZ 86301$20,595
22Randy A McdonaldCamp Verde, AZ 86322$20,454
23Mccracken Land & Cattle CoFlagstaff, AZ 86001$20,250
24Clarence A McdonaldCamp Verde, AZ 86322$20,246
25Little Horse Ranch LllpPhoenix, AZ 85004$19,833
26Steve CouryCottonwood, AZ 86326$19,611
27Campbell RanchSeligman, AZ 86337$18,750
28William A KensonPeeples Valley, AZ 86332$18,268
29Perkins Ranch IncChino Valley, AZ 86323$17,438
30Charles R HilbersCamp Verde, AZ 86322$17,044
31Hunt Family TrustPrescott, AZ 86302$16,639
32Camelot Farms IncCamp Verde, AZ 86322$16,614
33Yard Family Revocable TrustWilliams, AZ 86046$15,568
34T2 Ranch TrustPaulden, AZ 86334$14,885
35Frank H Geminden JrCamp Verde, AZ 86322$14,832
36Mike MulcaireCottonwood, AZ 86326$13,445
37Terry Blackmore Revocable TrustBagdad, AZ 86321$11,880
38Tres Alamos RanchLos Alamos, CA 93440$11,829
39Verde River Ranch LLCScottsdale, AZ 85251$11,783
40Larry D Krumm, 00000$11,625

* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.

** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”

<< Previous | Next >>

 

Farm Subsidies Education

AgMag