Farm Subsidy information
Arkansas
Total Subsidies in Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 108,533
Recipients of Total Subsidies from farms in Arkansas totaled $16,827,000,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Subsidies 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Bancorp South Bank ** | Paragould, AR 72450 | $14,826,994 |
22 | Soudan Farming Co | Marianna, AR 72360 | $14,622,726 |
23 | Deline Farms Partnership | Charleston, MO 63834 | $13,698,535 |
24 | Riverside Farms | Wynne, AR 72396 | $13,628,697 |
25 | Lockley Brothers | Hughes, AR 72348 | $13,047,173 |
26 | Big-mo Farm Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $12,796,308 |
27 | Eagle Lake Farm Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $12,730,294 |
28 | Victoria Partnership | Osceola, AR 72370 | $12,603,322 |
29 | Arkansas County Bank ** | De Witt, AR 72042 | $12,352,634 |
30 | Bobby Roark & Sons Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $11,800,187 |
31 | Agri Ventures | Texarkana, AR 71854 | $11,730,281 |
32 | Wabash Farms | Helena, AR 72342 | $11,546,220 |
33 | Mcgehee Bank Inc | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $11,451,704 |
34 | M & M Farm Partnership | Hickory Ridge, AR 72347 | $11,288,620 |
35 | Hawkins Farms | Leachville, AR 72438 | $10,666,950 |
36 | Bank Of Lake Village | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $10,607,387 |
37 | Bearskin Farms | Scott, AR 72142 | $10,553,605 |
38 | Trail Partnership | Widener, AR 72394 | $10,546,954 |
39 | Four Star Partnership | Portland, AR 71663 | $10,481,401 |
40 | Delta Production Credit Assn ** | Dermott, AR 71638 | $10,384,863 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”