Total Disaster Programs in Arkansas County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 843
Recipients of Total Disaster Programs from farms in Arkansas County, Arkansas totaled $16,349,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Disaster Programs 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | S & D Farm Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $85,696 |
42 | Fish Lake Planting Co | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $85,270 |
43 | David & Terry Simpson | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $84,730 |
44 | Full Quiver Farms | Saint Charles, AR 72140 | $84,592 |
45 | Knoll Farms Partnership | Almyra, AR 72003 | $81,763 |
46 | Josh Powell Farm | Humnoke, AR 72072 | $81,338 |
47 | Post Bayou Farms Partnership | Gillett, AR 72055 | $81,254 |
48 | Hampton Planting Co | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $80,347 |
49 | Kenneth Maier Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $80,266 |
50 | Rjs Planting Co | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $76,846 |
51 | Coker Farming Company | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $75,214 |
52 | Jhc Farms Ptrsp | De Witt, AR 72042 | $73,842 |
53 | Brandon Rodgers Family Ptrn | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $73,657 |
54 | Dean & Katie Price Farm Partnership | Almyra, AR 72003 | $73,510 |
55 | Donald Johnson | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $73,373 |
56 | James H Rubach & Sonya R Rubach Partnership | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $73,370 |
57 | Dean Watson And Tawana Watson Partnership | Saint Charles, AR 72140 | $72,456 |
58 | Roberson & Roberson | De Witt, AR 72042 | $72,295 |
59 | , | $71,760 | |
60 | Walter E Daniel Jr | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $71,187 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”