Total Commodity Programs in Chicot County, Arkansas, 2021
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 478
Recipients of Total Commodity Programs from farms in Chicot County, Arkansas totaled $10,580,000 in in 2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Total Commodity Programs 2021 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Rice Innovators Partnership | Monticello, AR 71655 | $53,527 |
42 | Lane Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $53,187 |
43 | John-jordan Farms Inc | Eudora, AR 71640 | $52,926 |
44 | South Ark Farms | Portland, AR 71663 | $52,122 |
45 | Larry And Doreen Pieroni Farm Par | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $50,359 |
46 | Bilberry Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $49,367 |
47 | Two Adams Farms | Dermott, AR 71638 | $49,130 |
48 | Halehay Planting Company LLC | Tallulah, LA 71282 | $48,966 |
49 | Nicholas Pieroni | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $47,751 |
50 | Ms Delta Organics LLC | Leland, MS 38756 | $46,405 |
51 | Ashton Fish Farm LLC | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $46,018 |
52 | Trinity Farms Partnership | Mc Gehee, AR 71654 | $40,814 |
53 | Samson Partnership | Dermott, AR 71638 | $40,814 |
54 | Edp Vaughn Farms | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $40,277 |
55 | Paul And Stacy Dunavant Farm | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $39,305 |
56 | Abco Farm Partnership | Mcgehee, AR 71654 | $39,224 |
57 | Charles Poole Farms | Eudora, AR 71640 | $39,010 |
58 | Elliott Farms Partnership | Lake Village, AR 71653 | $38,320 |
59 | Rankin Inc | Eudora, AR 71640 | $36,690 |
60 | T & J Farms Inc | Ripley, TN 38063 | $35,950 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”