Emergency Conservation Program in Jackson County, Arkansas, 1995-2021
Subsidy Recipients 1 to 20 of 126
Recipients of Emergency Conservation Program from farms in Jackson County, Arkansas totaled $1,725,000 in from 1995-2021.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Emergency Conservation Program 1995-2021 |
---|---|---|---|
1 | Eagle Lake Farm Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $258,572 |
2 | Falwell Family Ptnr | Bradford, AR 72020 | $219,056 |
3 | Rutledge & Rutledge Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $168,000 |
4 | South 7-11 Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $120,939 |
5 | R G Holden Land Co Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $93,457 |
6 | Winemiller Farms Ptnr | Swifton, AR 72471 | $86,640 |
7 | Allied Land Co | Newport, AR 72112 | $81,444 |
8 | Delta Planting Co Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $74,813 |
9 | Sandhill Land Co Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $73,048 |
10 | Darrin Hutchinson Farm Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $35,528 |
11 | 8400 Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $25,995 |
12 | Dorsey & Lewis Jones Farms LLC | Newport, AR 72112 | $25,920 |
13 | Black River Cattle Co Ptnr | Newport, AR 72112 | $22,878 |
14 | Holden Conner Realty Co Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $22,430 |
15 | Mc Mc Farms Inc | Wynne, AR 72396 | $20,888 |
16 | Van Wyck Planting Co | Tuckerman, AR 72473 | $20,000 |
17 | Steve Winemiller | Swifton, AR 72471 | $19,616 |
18 | Dennis And Malcolm Haigwood A Partnership | Newport, AR 72112 | $16,966 |
19 | A S & J LLC | Newport, AR 72112 | $15,632 |
20 | Gke Inc | Newport, AR 72112 | $14,691 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”
Next >>