Loan Deficiency in Jefferson County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 21 to 40 of 876
Recipients of Loan Deficiency from farms in Jefferson County, Arkansas totaled $31,123,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Loan Deficiency 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
21 | Benson Lake Farm Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $306,719 |
22 | Humphrey Farm Inc | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $296,908 |
23 | Dunklin & Dunklin Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $285,021 |
24 | Peek Farms | England, AR 72046 | $277,648 |
25 | J O Bennett And Sons Partnership | Lonoke, AR 72086 | $271,630 |
26 | George H Dunklin Jr | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $262,252 |
27 | Big D Farming Co | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $249,009 |
28 | Roger Hillis Farms | England, AR 72046 | $235,817 |
29 | Fox Farms | England, AR 72046 | $234,265 |
30 | Joey Hillis Farms | England, AR 72046 | $231,164 |
31 | Orlicek Farms Ptr | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $230,831 |
32 | Claud Bost & Son Farm | Pine Bluff, AR 71603 | $226,348 |
33 | Donald Pipkin Dba Pipkin Farms | Sherrill, AR 72152 | $222,067 |
34 | Ruggeri And Son Farm Inc | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $220,594 |
35 | Arkansas Department Of Correction | Pine Bluff, AR 71611 | $214,269 |
36 | Capps Farm Ptr | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $210,065 |
37 | Chris Stone Farm Partnership | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $209,739 |
38 | Rickey & Patricia Hayes | Gillett, AR 72055 | $207,950 |
39 | Richmond Farming | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $206,303 |
40 | Euseppi Bros | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $205,853 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”