Direct Payment Program in Jefferson County, Arkansas, 1995-2023
Subsidy Recipients 41 to 60 of 1,203
Recipients of Direct Payment Program from farms in Jefferson County, Arkansas totaled $108,945,000 in from 1995-2023.
Rank | Recipient (* ownership information available) |
Location | Direct Payment Program 1995-2023 |
---|---|---|---|
41 | Roe Farms | Moscow, AR 71659 | $700,101 |
42 | Richland Planting Co | Moscow, AR 71659 | $687,835 |
43 | Ronny Dean Ptr Farmall Co | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $659,928 |
44 | Antom Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $656,373 |
45 | Peavine Farming Co | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $649,549 |
46 | James V & Cathy M Webb J V | Scott, AR 72142 | $604,681 |
47 | Whiskey Creek Arkansas | Lawton, IA 51030 | $602,448 |
48 | Roger Hillis Farms | England, AR 72046 | $586,124 |
49 | Fox Farms | England, AR 72046 | $585,133 |
50 | Hooker Farm And Ranch | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $559,126 |
51 | Richmond Farming | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $546,975 |
52 | C & D Farms | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $527,751 |
53 | Pipkin Bros Land Co | Sherrill, AR 72152 | $512,437 |
54 | Claud Bost & Son Farm | Pine Bluff, AR 71603 | $509,090 |
55 | M C Farms | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $505,265 |
56 | B And B Farms | Pine Bluff, AR 71601 | $494,842 |
57 | J & J Planting | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $492,474 |
58 | Everett Farm Partnership | White Hall, AR 71602 | $486,680 |
59 | Dunklin & Dunklin Farms | Stuttgart, AR 72160 | $479,909 |
60 | Euseppi Bros | Altheimer, AR 72004 | $472,832 |
* USDA data are not "transparent" for many payments made to recipients through most cooperatives. Recipients of payments made through most cooperatives, and the amounts, have not been made public. To see ownership information, click on the name, then click on the link that is titled Ownership Information.
** EWG has identified this recipient as a bank or lending institution that received the payment because the payment applicant had a loan requiring any subsidy payments go to the lender first. In 2019, the information provided to EWG by USDA began to include the entity that received the payment, rather than the person or entity that applied for it, which was previously provided. This move to shield subsidy recipients from disclosure enables USDA to further evade taxpayer accountability. Six percent of subsidy dollars went to banks, lending institutions, or the Farm Service Agency.”